MyCreditApp.AI · B2B SaaS · fintech

Turn a narrow credit tool into a workflow that can scale with the business

I expanded the product around two user roles, three financing products, business relationships and document readiness while keeping the existing Material UI foundation intact.

Product designIAComplex workflowsRole-based UX
Three financing product entry points
Forwarder businesses workspace
RoleProduct designer
ScopeApplications, businesses, document readiness
UsersShippers & forwarders
ConstraintMaterial UI foundation

The earlier experience exposed features. The new product needed to expose a journey.

The original model was narrow: users could upload documents, view analytics and move through one credit path. Adding new financing products and a richer forwarder role made that structure increasingly difficult to extend.

Earlier business model
Before A business was essentially an analysis destination.
Earlier document upload path
Before The product model was built around a narrow single path.
01Product model

New capabilities needed a structure that could scale beyond one credit flow.

02Role clarity

Shippers and forwarders shared data but had different goals and navigation priorities.

03Next action

Users needed to understand what they could do now, not only what data existed.

One entry point, three financing products with a shared interaction pattern

Instead of hiding financing behind a generic action, the Applications page explains the available products in business language: Request credit terms, Request trade finance, and Apply for factoring.

Applications product selection
Product selection Three financing products share a recognizable starting point while setting distinct expectations.

Shared interaction pattern, product-specific questions

The flow keeps navigation and progression consistent, while the questions change with the financing product. The completed request is shown after the initial steps, before submission, so users can verify the full request before committing.

Completed application review before submission
Review before submit The filled request appears after the initial steps so users can verify terms, trade profile and security before submission.
Credit terms application form
Credit terms A concise four-step request focused on terms, trade profile and security.
Trade finance application form
Trade finance Product-specific trade role and facility questions.
Factoring application form
Factoring The same structural pattern with customer, supplier and payment logic.

The workflow continues after submission

Applications became manageable objects rather than one-off forms. Users can inspect status and approved terms, accept an agreement, or edit and withdraw a pending request.

Applications list and post-submit actions
After submit Status, terms and available actions stay visible after the form is complete.

A business became more than a card with a score

For forwarders, I expanded business management into a relationship model. Invited companies, active connections, private records and archived businesses have different meanings, so the workspace makes those states explicit.

Businesses workspace
Businesses Relationship states, search, sorting and reconnect/archive actions live in one workspace.

Inside a business, tabs preserve company context across overview, documents, analytics and financial requests instead of sending users back to disconnected global features.

Persistent business context across tabs
Persistent context The selected business stays visible while the user changes tasks.

From a file history to an understandable readiness model

In this first iteration, document handling did not yet include processing states or manual review. The problem was more fundamental: users needed to understand whether the required financial periods were present before moving to analysis.

Earlier analysis-focused business experience
Before Missing data was secondary to the analysis destination.
Document coverage overview
After Coverage is visible by document type and month, with missing data connected to its source.
What changed

The interface answers “are we ready?” before “run analysis”

Run analysis and its blocked state are outcomes of the same readiness model. The user either has enough required data to continue, or can see what is missing.

The redesign created a product structure that could grow without rewriting the visual foundation

The strongest contribution was architectural: the product gained clearer roles, reusable application patterns, lifecycle states and persistent business context while remaining compatible with the existing Material UI system.

Product contribution

Scale the product model before polishing the surface

The new structure made future financing products and relationship-based workflows easier to add coherently.

ApplicationsThree financing products share one understandable entry point.
LifecycleRequests remain manageable after submission.
RolesShipper and forwarder journeys have clearer priorities.
FoundationThe redesign extends rather than replaces Material UI.